Landor v. Louisiana Dept of Corrections and Public Safety · ¶104

This conclusion flows from a concession respondents make without reservation: “[T]here is no dispute that Louisiana prison officials must comply with RLUIPA’s substantive protections.” Brief for Respondents 46. Respondents, in other words, do not place prison officials beyond RLUIPA’s substantive reach; accepting that RLUIPA imposes a duty on prison officials, they just seek to “exempt” those officials “from any of its liability provisions.” Depart ment of Agriculture Rural Development Rural Housing Ser vice v. Kirtz, 601 U. S. 42, 62 (2024).

slip opinion, revised 6/28/26
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.