gloss · the reading room

Landor v. Louisiana Dept of Corrections and Public Safety · ¶52

This severance of rights and remedies is a sleight of hand; it comes by way of the majority’s full-throated endorsement of a contract analogy even though what secures the rights at issue is not a contract but a law. Today’s decision magically transforms a federal statute into an invitation to be accepted or declined, deemed binding only if each particular defendant has explicitly agreed to be penalized. No matter that laws, as opposed to contracts, don’t ordinarily work this way. The trick here is the majority’s effortless conflation of law making and agreement making—two different sources of binding authority.
Read in context ›

slip opinion, revised 6/28/26
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.