Landor v. Louisiana Dept of Corrections and Public Safety · ¶71

Importantly, RFRA was not meant to be merely advisory; like the constitutional rights it sought to imitate, RFRA needed bite. Thus, “RFRA made clear that it was reinstating both the pre-Smith substantive protections of the First Amendment and the right to vindicate those protections by a claim.” Tanzin, 592 U. S., at 50. It did so by authorizing “appropriate relief” for violations of its terms. § 2000bb–1(c).

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.