Galette v. New Jersey Transit Corp. · ¶29
Employing similar logic, the Court also held that entities created by the Federal Government were not its “arms” when they possessed the separate personhood of a corporation. See, e. g., Metropolitan R. Co. v. District of Columbia, 132 U. S. 1, 7–8 (1889); Sloan Shipyards Corp. v. United States Shipping Bd. Emergency Fleet Corporation, 258 U. S. 549, 566–568 (1922); Federal Land Bank of St. Louis v. Priddy, 295 U. S. 229, 235–237 (1935); Keifer & Keifer v. Re construction Finance Corporation, 306 U. S. 381, 393–394 (1939).Read in context ›
preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.