Wolford v. Lopez · ¶109

Applying old principles to new circumstances is not always easy. This case, however, is not hard. While most Hawaiians might prefer that no one carry frearms in public places, a majority's opposition to a constitutional right is not a permissible basis for restricting it. After all, “[t]he very purpose of a Bill of Rights was to withdraw certain subjects from the vicissitudes of political controversy” and “to place them beyond the reach of majorities and officials.” West Virginia Bd. of Ed. v. Barnette, 319 U. S. 624, 638 (1943).

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.