Wolford v. Lopez · ¶140

All this makes clear that Hawaii’s law does not restrict the right to carry a gun at all. Instead, its law vindicates its resident’s property rights by operating on the scope of the implied license to enter. And it does so by requiring gun owners to seek express consent, rather than assume implied consent. See §134–9.5(b). Consequently, Hawaii’s law simply does not implicate the Second Amendment, as Bruen’s first step requires.

slip opinion
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.