Wolford v. Lopez · ¶161

Hawaii cites a combination of founding-era and Reconstruction-era laws. From those analogues, a principle plainly emerges: States routinely required affrmative consent for armed carry onto private property to vindicate the rights of property owners, including the right to exclude, and to prevent real-world harms arising from unauthorized armed carry.

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.