Wolford v. Lopez · ¶162
The analogues cited by Hawaii clearly establish that legislatures historically required affirmative consent for carrying a firearm onto private property—the same “how” as §134–9.5. And they did so to protect property owners’ interests in response to concerns related to unauthorized armed entry—the same “why” as §134–9.5.Read in context ›
slip opinion
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.