Wolford v. Lopez · ¶63

Hawaii nonetheless argues that petitioners’ challenge fails at the first step of Bruen’s two-step framework because “the right to bear arms did not encompass the right to armed entry onto private property without the owner’s consent.” Brief for Respondent 9. The State then launches into a lengthy discussion of historical materials and precedents that, it contends, supports this argument. Id., at 9–27.

slip opinion
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.