gloss · the reading room

Wolford v. Lopez · ¶74

Finally, we come to the State's most remarkable analogue, an 1865 Louisiana statute that made it unlawful “for any person or persons to carry fre-arms on the premises or plantations of any citizen, without the consent of the owner or proprietor, other than in lawful discharge of a civil or military order.” 1865 La. Acts No. 10, § 1, p. 14. Regardless of this provision's pedigree, it has no probative value for present purposes. As we have said, in considering the probative value of a historical analogue, we must consider whether it was widespread, well-known, and widely accepted. See Bruen, 597 U. S., at 35. Because this statute was neither widespread nor widely accepted, it carries no weight.
Read in context ›

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.