Rico v. United States · ¶13

In approaching this dispute, a preliminary note on terminology is warranted. The Ninth Circuit held that a defendant who absconds during supervised release “tolls” his existing, judicially ordered term of supervised release until federal authorities find him. This is a misnomer. In legal settings, the word “toll” often denotes some stop or pause. See Artis v. District of Columbia, 583 U. S. 71, 80–82 (2018). But under the Ninth Circuit's approach, a defendant who absconds stops or pauses nothing. Rather, he remains subject to the conditions of his supervised release and can be held accountable for any violations he commits during his abscondment. What the Ninth Circuit's rule really does is ex tend the period of supervised release beyond what a judge has ordered. On its view, an absconding defendant's term of supervised release does not expire when a court has directed but continues to…

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.