Rico v. United States · ¶20

If more evidence were needed to illustrate how unlikely the Ninth Circuit's rule is, § 3624(e) would supply it. That provision indicates that a “term of supervised release does not run during any period in which the person is imprisoned in connection with a conviction” for 30 consecutive days or more. This is a true tolling rule, one that stops the clock running on a defendant's term of supervised release. Yet, like the Act's extension rules, it is narrow in scope and nothing at all like the rule the Ninth Circuit has adopted.

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.