Rico v. United States · ¶47

I am bemused by the notion that petitioner was on supervised release when she was evading all supervision. (I suppose she was on “unsupervised supervised release.”) And it seems strange to regard a crime committed after the expiration of “unsupervised supervised release” as a non-event. By that logic, if petitioner had gone on a murder spree after the expiration of the period of unsupervised supervised release, the sentencing judge would have been required to put that out of his mind.

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.