Rico v. United States · ¶9
Ms. Rico appealed that decision. Perhaps the district court could revoke her supervised release based on her failure to report and her January 2021 offenses. Perhaps, as well, the district court could order her to serve 16 months in prison (after all, she committed two Grade C violations, each carrying an advisory sentence of 8 to 14 months) and a new term of supervised release. But, she insisted, the court had no lawful authority to treat her January 2022 state drug offense as an independent supervised release violation. The court could not do so, Ms. Rico argued, because that offense occurred after her pre-existing term of federal supervised release expired in June 2021.Read in context ›
preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.