gloss · the reading room

Hunter v. United States · ¶29

In keeping with our usual practice, we decline to decide in the first instance how that dispute should come out under the miscarriage-of-justice approach we adopt today. The Court of Appeals did not address that question, because its Circuit precedent required a narrower inquiry. And we are, as we usually say, “a court of review, not of first view.” Cut ter v. Wilkinson, 544 U. S. 709, 718, n. 7 (2005). It is therefore now up to the Fifth Circuit to decide whether enforcing Hunter's appeal waiver would result in a miscarriage of justice.
Read in context ›

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.