gloss · the reading room

Monsanto v. Durnell · ¶101

Here, the majority falters on both tasks. FIFRA’s labeling requirements are established by statute and regulation, and those requirements are no different than the labeling duties imposed by Missouri via its failure-to-warn tort. The state-law claim at issue reflects a parallel requirement that is fully consistent with FIFRA’s primary labeling duty—its misbranding prohibition—and makes no additional asks of those who are subject to it.
Read in context ›

slip opinion
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.