Monsanto v. Durnell · ¶136

Another variation of this argument is the majority's contention that it is a violation of FIFRA's misbranding provision “if a manufacturer sells its pesticide with a different label than the one [the] EPA approved.” Ante, at 378. The majority offers no support for this assertion—and there is none. The statutory definition of misbranding does not say that a pesticide sold with a label different from the EPA- approved label is necessarily misbranded. See generally § 136(q).

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.