Monsanto v. Durnell · ¶48
This Court’s precedents reinforce that textual conclusion. In Bates, the Court explained that the relevant labeling “requirements” under FIFRA included FIFRA’s misbranding provision and “any relevant EPA regulations that give content to FIFRA’s misbranding standards.” 544 U. S., at 453.Read in context ›
slip opinion
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.