Monsanto v. Durnell · ¶94

So, I respectfully dissent. In accepting Monsanto’s argument and holding that Durnell’s failure-to-warn claim is preempted, the Court misunderstands FIFRA’s requirements, misinterprets the scope of FIFRA’s preemption, and ultimately leaves Durnell without a remedy for the significant harms he has suffered.

slip opinion
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.