Louisiana v. Callais · ¶114

Third, while the dissent wraps itself in the mantle of stare decisis, the dissent is unabashedly at war with key precedents. See post, at 170 (claiming that Rucho was disastrously wrong and should be cabined); post, at 132, 134–135, 168 (repeatedly criticizing Shelby County and citing the dissent in that case); post, at 130–131 (criticizing the Court's decision in Brnovich). Respect for precedent cannot be a one-way street.

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.