Louisiana v. Callais · ¶142
But then Congress stepped in, to reverse Bolden's intent requirement—and create the statute existing today. The House began the process with a simple change to Section 2's text. It replaced the words “to deny or abridge” with the phrase “in a manner which results in a denial or abridgement of,” to make the section look like this:Read in context ›
preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.