Louisiana v. Callais · ¶179
That void is more remarkable still given Allen's own reaffrmation of Gingles on the merits (even putting aside its precedential status). Just control-find for all my citations of Allen (or better yet read the decision), and you will have a good idea of its character. In addition to awarding Gingles the highest form of stare decisis protection, Allen (1) traced the history of Section 2's amendment as I have, focusing on Congress's rejection of Bolden's motive inquiry in favor of White's effects test, see 599 U. S., at 10–14; (2) explained as I have how each part of the Gingles framework functions and how the Court has used that framework “[f]or the past forty years” “in one § 2 case after another,” 599 U. S., at 17– 19; (3) showed how the District Court's analysis (which closely resembles the one here) conformed in all respects to Gingles, see 599 U. S., at 19–23; and (4) rejected the…Read in context ›
preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.