gloss · the reading room

Louisiana v. Callais · ¶79

This interpretation of § 2 does not require abandonment of the Gingles framework. We need only update the framework so it aligns with the statutory text and refects important developments since we decided Gingles 40 years ago. Four historical developments are of particular note.
Read in context ›

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.