Pitts v. Mississippi · ¶13

After a jury convicted him, Pitts appealed. 405 So. 3d, at 31. Invoking Coy and Craig, he argued that the trial court had failed to make the case-specific finding of necessity the Sixth Amendment requires and, as remedy, sought a new trial. 405 So. 3d, at 31–35.

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.