Pitts v. Mississippi · ¶23

Before this Court, the State does not so much defend the Mississippi Supreme Court's various efforts to distinguish Coy and Craig as press a different argument still. As the State sees it, the trial court did “hear evidence” and make a “case-specific” “finding of necessity.” See Craig, 497 U. S., at 855.

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.