gloss · the reading room

Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump · ¶134

To arrive at that conclusion, the dissent consults four clues we have sometimes employed in our major questions cases to help assess whether a statute clearly authorizes an asserted power. See West Virginia, 597 U. S., at 746 (Gorsuch, J., concurring). The dissent formulates these clues largely as I would. See post, at 363–366. But, to my eyes, the dissent engages in a little grade infation when applying them.
Read in context ›

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.