Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump · ¶163
Given this history, it's no surprise that the dissent relies mostly on statutes and cases after 1890. Post, at 386–387. But even they do little to support its claim. J. W. Hampton, Jr., & Co. v. United States, 276 U. S. 394 (1928), for example, involved a law instructing the President to “investigat[e]” the costs of production for American frms and their foreign counterparts and issue tariffs to “equalize” those costs. Id., at 401, 409 (internal quotation marks omitted). The statute the Court faced in Marshall Field & Co. v. Clark, 143 U. S. 649, 681 (1892), spoke similarly. Even when Federal Energy Administration v. Algonquin SNG, Inc., 426 U. S. 548, came along in 1976, the Court upheld President Ford's imposition of monetary exactions on a single class of products under a statute that provided at least some guidance about how he should implement the law. Id., at 559. And whether…Read in context ›
preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.