Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump · ¶187

Granted, strong-form canons exist elsewhere in the law. See Nebraska, 600 U. S., at 508–509 (Barrett, J., concurring). I do not propose to abandon these canons, nor have I taken the position that adopting them necessarily exceeds the judicial power. Id., at 509, n. 2. But I am skeptical about adding new ones to the mix. Ibid. And while the major questions doctrine has an impressive pedigree as an interpretive principle, this Court has not (yet, anyway) embraced it as a strong-form rule that imposes a “ `clarity tax' ” on Congress. Id., at 508.

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.