gloss · the reading room

Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump · ¶371

In an ordinary statutory interpretation case, I am confdent that a majority of this Court would fatly reject the plaintiffs' exceedingly weak statutory arguments and would hold that IEEPA's authorization for the President to “regulate . . . importation” during national emergencies includes the power to impose tariffs.
Read in context ›

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.