Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump · ¶380

Because the major questions doctrine demands “clear congressional authorization,” this Court has repeatedly recognized that the doctrine is “distinct” from “routine statutory interpretation.” West Virginia, 597 U. S., at 724 (quotation marks omitted). Importantly, therefore, the doctrine applies—and makes a meaningful difference—only in cases where the Executive's “reading of a statute” “would, under more ordinary circumstances, be upheld.” Ibid. (quotation marks omitted); see also id., at 740, 742, n. 3 (Gorsuch, J., concurring); M. Sohoni, The Major Questions Quartet, 136 Harv. L. Rev. 262, 272–276 (2022).

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.