Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump · ¶405

Third, there is no mismatch: The power to tariff falls squarely within the President's wheelhouse. From the Founding, as The Chief Justice’s opinion today acknowledges, numerous other statutes have afforded—and still do afford—the President broad power to impose tariffs. Ante, at 243–244. This case is entirely different, therefore, from our prior major questions cases, where, for example, the CDC attempted to impose an eviction moratorium, Alabama Assn. of Realtors, 594 U. S., at 763–765; OSHA sought to implement a nationwide vaccine mandate, NFIB, 595 U. S., at 117–120; the FDA tried to regulate cigarettes, Brown & Williamson, 529 U. S., at 159–161; and the Attorney General attempted to regulate physician-assisted suicide, Gonzales, 546 U. S., at 267–268.

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.