Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump · ¶428

If the major questions doctrine is designed in part to protect nondelegation principles, but the nondelegation doctrine does not play a substantial role in foreign affairs cases (as the Court has held), then it follows that courts should not employ the major questions doctrine to put a thumb on the scale against the President when interpreting foreign affairs statutes. Rather, as Justice Robert Jackson stated, courts should interpret those statutes as written.

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.