Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump · ¶429

Relatedly, to the extent that the major questions doctrine is designed to refect a “practical understanding of legislative intent,” West Virginia, 597 U. S., at 723, the doctrine appropriately plays no role in “national security or foreign policy contexts, because the canon does not refect ordinary congressional intent in those areas.” FCC v. Consumers' Re search, 606 U. S. 656, 706 (2025) (Kavanaugh, J., concurring). In the foreign affairs realm, Congress “has good reason to— and intends to—authorize many executive branch actions related to foreign affairs in broad or general terms.” Bradley & Goldsmith, 172 U. Pa. L. Rev., at 1793.

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.