Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump · ¶457

Again, consider the similarities between Dames & Moore and this case. Dames & Moore involved complicated questions of foreign policy and national security. The statutes in Dames & Moore were generally worded and did not specifically authorize suspension of claims. But Presidents had historically exercised a similar power. See id., at 677–682. Here, we likewise have a generally worded statutory authorization to “regulate . . . importation.” And Presidents have historically imposed tariffs.

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.