gloss · the reading room

Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump · ¶470

To be clear, I am not suggesting that there is no nondelegation doctrine in the foreign affairs realm. But the Court has consistently recognized that the doctrine affords more fexibility to Congress and the President in that area to deal with the complex foreign relations issues and national security threats facing America. See Association of American Railroads, 575 U. S., at 80, n. 5 (opinion of Thomas, J.); Youngstown, 343 U. S., at 636, n. 2 (Jackson, J., concurring); Curtiss-Wright, 299 U. S., at 319–322; Panama Refning, 293 U. S., at 422.
Read in context ›

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.