Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump · ¶61

Finally, the Government invokes Dames & Moore v. Regan, 453 U. S. 654 (1981), but that case offers no support. Dames & Moore was exceedingly narrow,did not address the President's power to “regulate,” and did not involve tariffs at all. If anything, that case highlights the importance of close attention to IEEPA's text. “The terms of . . . IEEPA,” we held, “do not authorize” the suspension of claims. Id., at 675. So too here; the terms of IEEPA do not authorize tariffs.

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.