Cox Communications, Inc. v. Sony Music Entertainment · ¶56

I agree with the majority that neither of the two prior theories of secondary liability applied by this Court covers Cox's conduct. See ante, at 595–596. The majority is wrong, however, that those are or should be the only two forms of secondary liability for copyright infringement. The majority's artificial limiting of secondary liability is supported by neither precedent nor statute.

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.