FS Credit Opportunities Corp. v. Saba Capital Master Fund, Ltd. · ¶101

Indeed, in this very case the majority purports to know what “Congress intended” when it inserted an “express provision of one method of enforcement” in the ICA. Ante, at 7 (internal quotation marks and alterations omitted). It appears, then, that our disagreement today is really about the tools courts use to ascertain congressional intent, not its importance or knowability. See ante, at 11, n. 5 (characterizing congressional intent drawn from text as “objectified intent” (internal quotation marks omitted)).

slip opinion
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.