FS Credit Opportunities Corp. v. Saba Capital Master Fund, Ltd. · ¶34

In the dissent’s view, the key to this case lies in two Committee Reports expressing Congress’s “‘wish’” that courts liberally imply private rights of action. Post, at 1. The dissent repeatedly faults us for failing to consider these Reports, and broadly attempts to defend the use of legislative history in interpreting statutes. Post, at 1, 11–22. Its efforts do not just fail—they backfire.

slip opinion
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.