FS Credit Opportunities Corp. v. Saba Capital Master Fund, Ltd. · ¶66

To be sure, the fact that Congress changed the statute provides an opening for the argument that Section 47(b) is different now. Ante, at 9–10. But to its credit, for all its emphasis on the “substantive” nature of Congress’s “renovation[s],” the majority never goes so far as to say that Congress rejected TAMA. Ante, at 9–10. Nothing in the text or structure of the amended Section 47(b) shows that Congress did so.

slip opinion
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.