FS Credit Opportunities Corp. v. Saba Capital Master Fund, Ltd. · ¶94
It is, in fact, the majority’s castigation of legislative history as something verging on extralegal (see, e.g., ante, at 14) that is the historical outlier. And that consternation is especially odd coming from a Court that eagerly delves into the transcripts of the ratification debates, the Framers’ private correspondence, and the Federalist Papers to ascertain what the Framers would have “understood,” “recognized,” and “expected.” Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump, 607 U. S. ＿＿＿, ＿＿＿ (2026) (slip op., at 6); Moore v. Harper, 600 U. S. 1, 21–22, 26–27 (2023); U. S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton, 514 U. S. 779, 789–822, 832–838, and nn. 23, 24 (1995).Read in context ›
slip opinion
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.