West Virginia v. B. P. J. · ¶158

The Court should have affirmed the Fourth Circuit’s decision to remand for further factfinding. In not taking this modest step, the majority badly errs in two ways. First, the majority concludes that B. P. J.’s claim fails regardless of the unresolved factual dispute over whether transgender girls are similarly situated to cisgender girls for the reasons B. P. J. gives. That is wrong. As the Court’s precedents recognize, factual disputes like this one relate to the fit of the classification and whether it survives heightened scrutiny. Second, the majority suggests that, even if relevant, the factual dispute implicates scientific uncertainty and that West Virginia’s decision is thus entitled to conclusive deference. Here, too, the majority missteps, invoking cases applying rational-basis review, citing extra-record evidence, and ignoring critical context merely because it is inconvenient.

slip opinion
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.