West Virginia v. B. P. J. · ¶84

The plaintiffs characterize their equal protection argument in three overlapping ways—(i) as a lack of substantial relationship between the law’s biological-sex classification and the State’s interests in safety and competitive fairness; (ii) as an as-applied challenge to the biological-sex classification; and (iii) as discrimination against transgender athletes. Under this Court’s precedents, none of those three arguments succeeds.

slip opinion
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.