gloss · the reading room

Berk v. Choy · ¶23

Cohen thus did not identify and exempt a broad category of so-called preconditions to proceeding from conflict with the Federal Rules. It held that a particular state law addressed a matter that was unaddressed by the relevant Federal Rule. Here, by contrast, the state law and the Federal Rule address the same issue: the information that a plaintiff must provide about the merits of his claim at the outset of litigation. Describing the affidavit requirement as a “preconditio[n] to proceeding” does not magically dispel the conflict.
Read in context ›

slip opinion
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.