Berk v. Choy · ¶27

Cohen thus did not identify and exempt a broad category of so-called preconditions to proceeding from confict with the Federal Rules. It held that a particular state law addressed a matter that was unaddressed by the relevant Federal Rule. Here, by contrast, the state law and the Federal Rule address the same issue: the information that a plaintiff must provide about the merits of his claim at the outset of litigation. Describing the affidavit requirement as a “preconditio[n] to proceeding” does not magically dispel the confict.

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.