Berk v. Choy · ¶34

In applying this analysis, we have “rejected every statutory challenge to a Federal Rule that has come before us.” Shady Grove, 559 U. S., at 407 (plurality opinion). We have upheld Rules governing the certification of class actions, id., at 408 (Rule 23); see id., at 416, 436 (Stevens, J., concurring in part and concurring in judgment) (Rule 23); service of process, Mississippi Publishing Corp., 326 U. S., at 445–446 (Rule 4(f)); compelled mental and physical examinations, Sib bach, 312 U. S., at 14–16 (Rule 35); sanctions for frivolous appeals, Burlington, 480 U. S., at 8 (Rule 38); and sanctions for signing court papers without reasonably investigating the facts asserted, Business Guides, 498 U. S., at 551–554 (Rule 11).

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.