Berk v. Choy · ¶53

Resisting this conclusion, defendants rely on three cases to argue that “this Court has long found applicable in federal court” “state-law condition[s] on allowing suits to proceed.” Brief for Respondent Beebe 26–27, and n. 11; see also Brief for Respondent Choy 36–37. But that argument mischaracterizes our past rulings. See Cohen v. Benefcial Industrial Loan Corp., 337 U. S. 541 (1949); Woods v. Interstate Realty Co., 337 U. S. 535 (1949); Walker v. Armco Steel Corp., 446 U. S. 740.

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.