Berk v. Choy · ¶60

The majority discerns a confict with Rule 8 by reasoning as follows. With respect to the dismissal-related question quoted above, Delaware's law says that such a complaint must be dismissed because the affidavit of merit is missing, whereas Rule 8 prescribes all “the information a plaintiff must present about the merits of his claim at the outset of litigation”—namely, “ `a short and plain statement of the claim showing that [he] is entitled to relief.' ” Ante, at 193 (quoting Fed. Rule Civ. Proc. 8(a)(2)). “By requiring no more than a statement of the claim,” the majority continues, “Rule 8 establishes `implicitly, but with unmistakable clarity,' . . . that evidence of the claim is not required.” Ante, at 193.

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.