Berk v. Choy · ¶64

Accordingly, because § 6853 does not address or govern the required contents of a pleading, Delaware's law does not answer the same question as Rule 8. Instead, the State's affidavit requirement (which, incidentally, neither describes the affidavit of merit in relation to a plaintiff 's obligation to state a claim for relief nor treats it as evidence) is an additional filing requirement for commencing any medical malpractice civil action under state law. See § 6853(a)(1) (“No healthcare negligence lawsuit shall be fled in [Delaware] unless the complaint is accompanied by . . . [a]n affidavit of merit”). Finding a Rule 8 confict, as the majority does, thus requires contorting both Rule 8 and § 6853. There is no need to do so here, especially given the ready confict with Rule 3 (discussed above) and Rule 12 (described below).

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.