Chiles v. Salazar · ¶155
English common law held doctors liable for harm caused by their negligent medical treatment. 3 W. Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England *122 (W. Lewis ed. 1922) (1768). The English tradition carried forward; this legal claim has been available in our country since the founding. See K. De Ville, Medical Malpractice in Nineteenth- Century America: Origins and Legacy 3, 5 (1990) (De Ville). In the mid-1800s, the number of malpractice cases skyrocketed, flling the void left by the States' temporary deregulation of medical licensing. See id., at 25–34; see also id., at 115–137; Graham v. Gautier, 21 Tex. 111, 117–118 (1858) (observing that the lack of a licensing scheme demanded enforcement of a corresponding standard of care).Read in context ›
preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.